+1 Isn't is possible to accomplish all these efforts using tagged literals? https://github.com/miner/wilkins
This way the facilities for read-time code generation can be customized and any reader that supports tagged-literals will support this. All of this is data provided as arguments, no evaluation. Evaluation happens from the tag function. On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 8:24:15 PM UTC-5, Brian Goslinga wrote: > > Do we really need new syntax for feature expressions? Although it would be > more ugly than CL's feature expressions, we could use a reader literal. For > example #feature [<feature expression> <value>]. Using a reader literal is > simple, compatible with EDN, and allows for the feature expressions to be > backported to an older version of Clojure using a library. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
