On Jun 11, 2013, at 10:02 AM, JeremyS <jschoffen....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now, opinion time (more opinionated actually). Midje might be full of macros > and abstractions that I don't understand when I read the code. Hell it's full > of them. But I honestly never had to read it to write my tests. More It's > well documented and I there's is more functionality in the doc than I have > had to use. So congrats Brian. The Midje code is more obfuscated than it should be. It is gradually improving. Just as I've had a goal that the Midje API should be well-documented and gracious towards its user, I'm starting to have the goal that the internals should encourage extension. Kudos to those who've contributed (especially Alex Baranosky and Joseph Wilk). -------- Latest book: /Functional Programming for the Object-Oriented Programmer/ https://leanpub.com/fp-oo -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
