Greg <g...@kinostudios.com> writes: >> It's pretty ugly to use aliases for numerical code, e.g. with core.matrix, >> e.g. > > Agreed. It's nice that :require :refer :all is available for such instances, > isn't it?
Which leads to the crux of the question. Given that the functionality is there, and that you agree that it is useful, can you please therefore explain why you think a breaking change to ns is a good thing to remove something that we are still going to be able to do, but in a more verbose way. Please also explain at the same time, why (use 'core.matrix) remains clear and why this should not change to "(require 'core.matrix :refer :all)". The namespace declaration is too complex. The existence of ":use" is not what causes this. Phil -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
