I find that having both `:use` and `:require` in my `ns` declarations can, with a little judicious formatting, communicate something about which packages are core and which are peripheral. Having to obfuscate that distinction with a `:refer :all` tacked - in a visually obscure way - onto `:require` forms would make me sad. Not wildly sad, but wistfully sad that people would prefer a breaking change to simply avoiding something they don't want to use.
Or: On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Lee Spector <lspec...@hampshire.edu> wrote: > My point is just that the needs and priorities are diverse, and I wish people > wouldn't be so enthusiastic about deprecating features that are valued by > others in the community. -------- Latest book: /Functional Programming for the Object-Oriented Programmer/ https://leanpub.com/fp-oo -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
