Ben Wolfson <wolf...@gmail.com> writes: >> The idea that you can't cite websites is a conceit that ensures that >> academics continue to spend a 1000s of pounds a paper on puplication >> costs, when you can achieve much the same with a blog, some metadata and >> archive.org. >> >> Ah, that was good, I feel better now! >> > > The woes of academic publishing have nothing to do with the idea that you > can't cite websites; MLA and Chicago style both have provisions for citing > websites and I'm sure less widespread style guides do as well.
Of course, it's possible to do this technically, it's a social issue mostly. Anyway, I was ranting, don't take it too seriously. Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
