I haven't tested 1.9 or 2.0 yet, but I'm working with an existing project that depends in incanter and I don't think there is a return on investment for updating it at this time (only using a few features).
If I was starting now, I would go with 1.9 for my data analysis. --Joseph On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 7:36:11 AM UTC-5, Erebus Mons wrote: > > Joseph Guhlin wrote: > > > Incanter gets your pretty far, especially when combined with Gorilla > > REPL, but all the tools and features aren't quite there yet, but > progress > > is being made. > > Incanter is undergoing major change with the migration to core.matrix, and > a > break in the API. > > Has anybody of you tested incanter 1.9? > Are there plans for the release date of the stable 2.0? > > And how different is incanter 2.x from incanter 1.5x? > > In other words, if you were tempted to start data analysis in clojure now, > what would you do: > > a) take incanter 1.9 > b) take incanter 1.5.6 > c) wait a few more weeks/months for the release of incanter 2.0? > > Best, > > EM > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
