On 02/05/2015 22:25, Fluid Dynamics wrote:
Ah, but none of them are Lisps. No macros, no DSLs, and thus much less
of the productivity/code-size-efficiency gains.
Elixir's macros are quite Lispy under the hood and all 3 languages can
arguably generate sophisticated DSLs. I'm as much a fan of Lisp's
benefits as you are but I honestly can't attribute this manpower
discrepancy to the fact that Clojure is a Lisp. I think the community's
overemphasis on library composition could be a bigger factor.
gvim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
