For rails sure. What about Elixer & Yesod? Those could be just as modular for all I know... I'm just saying that one way or the other, those things should be taken into account since they are important.
OO junk leads to bloat. On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:15 PM, gvim <gvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/05/2015 00:53, Christopher Small wrote: > >> I disagree with the premise entirely. I think that the Clojure community >> has just done a better job of building smaller, more modular tooling. >> And this is frankly something I prefer, and find refreshing in the >> Clojure sphere (as compared with my previous Rails webdev experience). >> >> Note that to put things on the same footing, you'd want to be noting >> that Luminus depend on Ring and Compojure, with commit counts 761 and >> 865 resp, and contributor counts 73 and 29 resp. >> >> I'm not saying that Clojure can't improve it's offering in web dev with >> added libraries etc, but I wouldn't want to see us move away from the >> modularity with which we've built things, because I think it's a win. >> >> Just my 2 c >> >> Chris Small >> > > Most decent web frameworks these days are built from modular components so > this distinction is a bit laboured. Rails is built on top of Active* and > Rack so the Ring/Compojure distinction is illusory. Laravel is built on top > of Symfony components it could be argued that Symfony has played a similar > role to Ring/Compojure in the PHP community. > > Clojure's modular approach is great but I just don't see the need to > polarise when there's such a strong business case for structured > frameworks. If you look at most of the jobs in web development at > Indeed.com they're almost exclusively framework-based. Modular is great but > it would also be nice to see a few more Clojure jobs advertised. > > gvim > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/tA2_IbU0unE/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
