tbc++ - given your experience, would you consider a Clojure port to Erlang 
VM a viable idea for production workloads? I know Elixir comes pretty 
close, but I still prefer Lisp : ) .

On Monday, April 25, 2016 at 1:50:45 PM UTC-7, tbc++ wrote:
>
> As someone who has spent a fair amount of time playing around with such 
> things, I'd have to say people vastly misjudge the raw speed you get from 
> the JVM's JIT and GC. In fact, I'd challenge someone to come up with a 
> general use, dynamic language that is not based on the JVM and comes even 
> close to the speed of Clojure. 
>
> A LLVM/C++/RPython based version of Clojure would on a good day come in at 
> about 1/10 the speed of Clojure on the JVM for general use cases. 
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> > The main motivation would be performance gains.
>>
>> blah? so many impedance mismatches and layers of indirection that i
>> don't think it will gain much? i mean, it would probably be better to
>> spend time tuning gc parameters or something. just a rant / guess.
>> e.g. robovm is for some use cases perfectly fine performance wise
>> believe it or not.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking 
> zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C 
> programs.”
> (Robert Firth) 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to