On 6 November 2016 at 23:31, waffletower <christopherpenr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I find the semantic of the new (any?) function to be in conflict with > (not-any?) and a strange addition, at least with the chosen name. This > concern has come up on the "clojure dev" group as well. I have found a > different implementation of (any?) useful in my own projects: > > (defn any? > [pred coll] > (not (not-any? pred coll))) > > I found it odd that (not-any? pred coll) existed without (any? pred coll). > The clojure.core/some function does effectively the same thing as your any? function. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
