On Monday, November 7, 2016 at 12:16:28 AM UTC-6, Mars0i wrote: > > "any?" wasn't the only option. I would have gone with something obvious > like "always-true", or "yes", or even something possibly too-clever like > "arg-or-not-arg?" or "or-not-this?" > Or maybe: "argument?" "value?" "is-something?" "is-a-clojure-value?" "surrounding-expression-compiled?" (Since if the expression is not true, that's because it didn't compile.)
Or, obliquely inspired by Descartes <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogito_ergo_sum>: "i-am?" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
