+1 On Feb 14, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:14:12AM -0800, Min Chen wrote: >> That may be possible, but we don't need to restrict to only one component >> in the tag. It is just for quickly filtering emails. > > Sorry, but I think I disagree with this. I'd rather just have sensible > subject lines. Too much tagging is going to be impossible to enforce, > and frankly seems too complicated to figure out what to do as an email > author. > >> >> Thanks >> -min >> >> On 2/14/13 11:11 AM, "Chip Childers" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:09:00AM -0800, Min Chen wrote: >>>> I may prefer to have JIRA bug components rather than bug id in the >>>> subject. With Components, we can easily figure out what area this >>>> discussion is about. >>> >>> But aren't many features going to cross the components? I.e.: UI, API >>> and plugin changes? >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -min >>>> >>>> On 2/14/13 11:04 AM, "Chip Childers" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:54:34AM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >>>>>> Folks >>>>>> >>>>>> To make it easier to filter feature discuss emails by mail clients, >>>>>> Alex suggested that the feature [DISCUSS] emails should be of the >>>> format >>>>>> [DISCUSS][$JIRA-BUG-ID] feature short description >>>>>> >>>>>> Example : [DISUSS][CS-527]List API Performance Optimization >>>>>> >>>>>> I think this is a good suggestion and will make it simpler and >>>>>> consistent way for stakeholders to follow their threads. Can we agree >>>> to >>>>>> this? I will update the guidelines in wiki if there is no objection. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Animesh >>>>> >>>>> +1 with the caveat that it's helpful to use the full CLOUDSTACK-X bug >>>>> ID. >>>> >>>> >> >>
