> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 6:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Feature Discuss Emails Tag Update
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 02:14:21PM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 11:20 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: Feature Discuss Emails Tag Update
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:14:12AM -0800, Min Chen wrote:
> > > > That may be possible, but we don't need to restrict to only one
> > > > component in the tag. It is just for quickly filtering emails.
> > >
> > > Sorry, but I think I disagree with this. I'd rather just have sensible
> > > subject
> lines.
> > > Too much tagging is going to be impossible to enforce, and frankly
> > > seems too complicated to figure out what to do as an email author.
> > >
> > [Animesh>] Chip you are not saying no to adding CLOUDSTACK-X tag as I
> > proposed? I agree too many tags are harder to follow so let's keep it
> > to minimum that allows for efficient filtering
>
> I'm fine with the bug ID being in subject lines. In fact, I usually do it
> when there
> is one.
>
> My point is that I don't want us to go overboard with tags. If we just act
> like
> responsible individuals and use clear subject lines, we'll be fine.
[Animesh>] Agreed too many tags and people will not use any. But IMO bug-id
helps filtering much easily.
