On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 02:14:21PM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 11:20 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Feature Discuss Emails Tag Update > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:14:12AM -0800, Min Chen wrote: > > > That may be possible, but we don't need to restrict to only one > > > component in the tag. It is just for quickly filtering emails. > > > > Sorry, but I think I disagree with this. I'd rather just have sensible > > subject lines. > > Too much tagging is going to be impossible to enforce, and frankly seems too > > complicated to figure out what to do as an email author. > > > [Animesh>] Chip you are not saying no to adding CLOUDSTACK-X tag as I > proposed? I agree too many tags are harder to follow so let's keep it to > minimum that allows for efficient filtering
I'm fine with the bug ID being in subject lines. In fact, I usually do it when there is one. My point is that I don't want us to go overboard with tags. If we just act like responsible individuals and use clear subject lines, we'll be fine.
