Nope. You're right SysV is the good one. ----- Original Message ----- From: S�bastien Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:59 am Subject: Re: (clug-talk) New Linux distribution
> Le 11 D�cembre 2002 09:51, vous avez �crit : > > On Wednesday 11 December 2002 01:15, Shane&Lisa wrote: > > > In somewhat the same vein, clean simple /etc/rc.d directories > are cool > > > too. Some distros seem to scatter that info all over... > > > > you mean a BSD style init vs. a SysV style init? > > Hopefully he doesn't mean a hybrid version. /etc/rc.d is a SysV > thing, and > shouldn't be in a proper BSD init style. FreeBSD uses > /usr/local/etc/rc.d > which kinda defeats the purpose of /usr/local. Both SysV and BSD > have their > place, but I find nothing more annoying/confusing then systems that > try to > mix the two. >
