On 10/06/2014 10:36 AM, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
>> Sure, I think it would be good to require 10.6.
> 
> Moreover I believe nobody nowadays builds for 10.5 on 10.5.

Perhaps no one has to build that way for deployment but there could
still be people just building for their own host as the only computer
they have.  The fact that our dashboard reported this problem means
we are testing that case.

Clinton, I don't have a 10.5 machine anymore and the test is failing
on yours.  Please take whatever action you feel is appropriate to
resolve the test failure on that machine.  This could mean either
disabling rpath altogether on 10.5 or changing the new hunk:

> +  foreach(rpath ${${ikey}_RPATHS})
> +    set(changes ${changes} -delete_rpath "${rpath}")
> +  endforeach()

to warn and skip removal when hosted on 10.5.  Or another option you
find.

This needs to be resolved in the next day or two or the topic won't
be in CMake 3.1.

Thanks,
-Brad

-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to