> Von: "Mehdi Rabah" > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Christian Ehrlicher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Bill Hoffman schrieb: > > > >> Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >> > >>> On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Christian Ehrlicher wrote: > >>> ... > >>> > >>>> How do you define which vsvars32.bat (or vsvars64.bat) to use? I've > more > >>>> than one compiler on my system... > >>>> > >>> > >>> The first time you would have to run cmake in the right environment > (i.e. > >>> where the correct vcvars.bat has been executed). > >>> But I don't have a windows here, so I am not the best person for > this... > >>> > >>> > >> I realize some people get confused by this. However, I don't think it > is > >> too much to ask that you have a correct environment setup for using the > >> compiler. We ask no less on Linux/Unix. If gcc is incorrectly > installed, > >> and can't find headers, we don't try and add -I stuff to fix the > problem... > >> > >> That's my opinion too - I don't see the point why it should be so hard > to > > set up the correct environment so that it must be done by cmake. > > > > > Hi, > > The point is not to setup the compiler, it is to have cmake include path > pointing to standard locations. For example where STL header are > (like/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.3.2/include on > linux), to avoid extra configurations step in the IDE, not for the > compiler. > I talk especially about Eclipse CDT, in which STL automatic completion > work > well under linux, but not under windows.
This looks like a Eclipse bug rather than something cmake can do for you. As you already said - they're standard locations for the compiler so why should cmake care in any way? And as before - I've more than one compiler on my system... Christian -- GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen! Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake