> In addition to agreeing with Adam, I want to point out that even using
> the newest CMS UIs, people can actually remember to use <B> when they > want their items bold. Given a choice between, for example, EMPHASIS > and STRONG and HEADLINE, people get confused as to which one will > render the desired effect. So <B> is actually much more desirable to > users. Strangly enough, this preference is often shared by HTML > developers and even code developers, who would seemingly be technical > enough to "get it." This covers just about all the people that would > ever have a reason to _view source_ for a given article from within > the CMS. > ;-) > > Regards, > Peter Dresslar Isn't that missing the point? Authors shouldn't care less about how their content is *rendered*, they should care about how their content is structured and what it means :) I think getting from the "how it looks" mindset to the "what it means" is one of the most important factors of the advancements of CMS's best regards --- Mattias Konradsson -- http://cms-list.org/ trim your replies for good karma.
