Possibly,(and I thought of that) but I'm not experienced enough to know how to code that. This was something I had to get done very quickly. I may go revisit. Steve
-----Original Message----- From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List [mailto:CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 11:59 AM To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: the STACK stage On 2016-06-24, at 08:19, Gentry, Steve wrote: > I'm not getting the results I'd expect when STACK is the first in a pipeline. > What I thought would happen is the entire STACK is read into the stream and > then proceed onto the next stage. This is not happening. Here is my code: > 'PIPE stack' , > '| take 1' , > '| spec 33.8 1' , > '| var EXPDT' > Since TAKE shorts the remainder of its input to its secondary output stream, would it work to connect that secondary stream to HOLE? > I will have at least three lines in the stack. These three lines are created > by another command that uses the " STACK FIFO" (w/o the quotes). > I've hardly mastered connectors. I'd first try STACK LIFO then TAKE LAST 1. -- gil
