On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 01:18, Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM Capability) < shaw...@dxc.com> wrote:
> Would be preferable to avoid truncation of a longer new record when > dealing with recfm=VARIABLE. > But at this point, it sounds as if there is not an elegant resource-light > method for so doing? > Would you mind to mark the original as "deleted" and append the longer record to the RECFM V file maybe? But I guess you were going index by record number rather than a key. Rob
