> @script:ocaml@ > action << find.action; > check << find.check; > p << find.p; > @@ > Printf.printf "%s %s %s\n" action check (Dumper.dump p) > > On the code you provided whichis unfortunately much too long to include in > a message
I found my code examples short enough. > and that you could have surely shortened to illustrate whatever > is the problem. Does such a feedback indicate that you are still struggling with the understanding for the presented software situation? > I get the same output from both semantic patches, except that the line > numbers are different for the position variable p, Does this information contain a contradiction? Do you observe any repeated data sets? > because you have put it in a different place. Yes. - Thus I would expect that different column numbers will be displayed while the line numbers should be (mostly?) identical. > I don't see any reason why making the script code call a database would > have any impact on this issue. The database can provide ACID properties for parallel data processing, can't it? I would like to perform aggregate computations finally. Would you become interested in counting record sets anyhow? > If you do get different results for the above semantic patches, > please make a small .c file that illustrates the problem. I presented questionable differences once more a moment ago. https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/7228efff-76bb-44c9-e2cd-ea19bbd49...@web.de/ https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2020-April/007142.html Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
