On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Tobias Zimmerman wrote:
Sorry, you have confused me slightly (or perhaps given me false hope).
I have 3 targets in my project: (1) the preference pane; (2) a
framework;
and (3) an application.
1 & 2 are both dual mode insofar as they can be compiled and run
without
garbage collection. #3, which doesn't interact with the System
Prefs, but
uses code out of the framework (#2), requires GC. I thought the
point of
"supported" versus "required" compile options for frameworks was
that the
first would support a GC app, but not require it, and the second
would...well...require it. So, if a non-GC pref pane is loading a
"GC-Supported" framework, shouldn't it be GC-free?
Is the only way to do this to have entirely separate versions of the
framework? (or just put the same code in each target separately and
dispense
with a a framework)?
A framework can be dual mode; can support both GC and non-GC
operation. This is how all of the frameworks [should be -- seems one
slipped through] are compiled on the system.
The issue, though, is that you can't load a GC-required bundle into
System Preferences.app.
b.bum
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
