On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Patrick Rutkowski <rutsk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Milder tone? No thanks.
Awfully strong words from someone who waltzes onto a mailing list, lambastes the documentation, and admits in the very next sentence he has no idea what he's talking about. > > Any API that accepts binary data needs to give at least a hint as to what > format the binary data should be. Saying that just it accepts "data" is > disgusting. Period, end of argument. Did you read the spec that tells you how encodings are deduced from unhinted data? > If you want to advocate that it's perfectly fine to omit information about > the format of binary data, then you're just a moron. I'm not saying that > you're a moron for accidentally forgetting to document it, but if you want to > say (as you seem to be doing) that it's OK to consciously leave it out, then > you're just a moron. I've referred you to the moderator for being a disruptive jerk. --Kyle Sluder _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
