Change Filed to Field where appropriate.  Grumble...auto-correct...grumble.

--- On Thu, 11/11/10, Erik Buck <erik.b...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> From: Erik Buck <erik.b...@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: NSTextView vs NSTextField
> To: "Cocoa Dev" <cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com>, "Eric Gorr" 
> <mail...@ericgorr.net>
> Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 10:50 AM
> NSTextField doesn't display or edit
> text at all.  It uses an instance of NSTextView calle
> dthe "filed editor" to provide all text dispay and
> editing.  So you are right: NSTextFiled cannot do
> anythingthat NSTextView can't because NSTextField uses
> NSTextView.
> 
> NSTextView is a large and heavy weight object.  If you
> research the text subsystem, you will find multiple classes
> that collaborate to provide text display and editing. 
> NSTextView is just the tip of the ice burg.  It is the
> user visible "View" part of a huge infrastructure that
> includes "Model" and "Controller" components.  It is a
> big deal to set-up and tear-down the whole infrastructure
> each time an NSTextField becomes editable.  Therefore,
> all NSTextFields (Actually NSTextFiledCells) share a single
> NSTextView, the filed editor, per window.
> 
> As for why not set-up the whole text infrastructure for
> every label and leave it set up...the best answer is that
> all of this software worked well on 8MB NeXT Cubes, and not
> instantiating the entire text system for every field is one
> reason why.
> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Eric Gorr <mail...@ericgorr.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Eric Gorr <mail...@ericgorr.net>
> > Subject: NSTextView vs NSTextField
> > To: "Cocoa Dev" <cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com>
> > Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 8:45 AM
> > It seems to me that NSTextView can do
> > everything that NSTextField can and more. For example,
> on a
> > NSTextView, one can use the method
> setHorizontallyResizable:
> > and then call sizeToFit to get it to resize itself
> > vertically instead of horizontally.
> > 
> > Is this correct?
> > 
> > If so and if I am programmatically creating one of
> these
> > controls, is there any reason why I would want to use
> a
> > NSTextField?
> > (I know that IB uses a NSTextField for Labels, for
> > example...is this just a historical artifact?)
> > 
> > If not, what are the key differences between them
> that
> > would cause me to want to use a NSTextField? Would it
> > basically come down to whether or not I need more then
> a
> > single line of text or not...NSTextField seems to be
> > optimized for single lines of text, but one can still
> get
> > the same behavior out of a NSTextView with a bit more
> work.
> > 
> > Now, I know that NSTextFieldCell is commonly used as
> a
> > superclass for one's own cell based stuff, but I
> would
> > consider that as separate from the issue of
> NSTextField vs
> > NSTextView.
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > 
> > Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
> > 
> > Please do not post admin requests or moderator
> comments to
> > the list.
> > Contact the moderators at
> > cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
> > 
> > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/erik.buck%40sbcglobal.net
> > 
> > This email sent to erik.b...@sbcglobal.net
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
> 
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to
> the list.
> Contact the moderators at
> cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
> 
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/erik.buck%40sbcglobal.net
> 
> This email sent to erik.b...@sbcglobal.net
>
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to