On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Roland King wrote:
> It seems if I have a method I really don't want to be dynamic, I should call
> it a class-specific name (which I just did, my internalInit is now
> internalInit_MyClass, ugly though)
This is the approach I take. Granted it's ugly, but at least it's privately
ugly (you aren't uglifying your class's public API), and the name is slightly
more intention-revealing ("this code is only for this class"). *Because* the
name is ugly, anyone skimming the code can tell it's doing something out of the
ordinary.
I hadn't thought of using functions -- good to have an option to consider in
the future -- but offhand it seems I'd prefer a method so I have the option of
calling super and so that I can use Objective-C syntax for arguments. These are
minor considerations though.
--Andy
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
