Jacek Ambroziak wrote: > --- Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >> >>>"Jacek R. Ambroziak" wrote: >>> >>> > >>>Anyway, seriously, XSLTC *is* a solution to the >>> >>XSLT bottleneck problem. >> > >>My question is this: how does it _scale_. >> >> > >>I would like to see the *same* tests with 100 >>threads each performing >>500 translations (yes they can have their own >>instance of the translet >>in each thread as is necessary). I would like to >>see that in comparison >>to Xalan and Saxon. >> >> > > Have you tested Xalan/Saxon/XSLTC in your > multithreaded environment? > > I don't see a priori reasons why translets should > scale worse...
I have run Xalan and Saxon (As have just about every other Cocooner). For the low volume highly personalized webapps I generally create, it is ok. However, I have seen much room for improvement--server side caching helps. ---------------------------------------------------- Sign Up for NetZero Platinum Today Only $9.95 per month! http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]