Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
> It's sad to read though that:
> 2) Cocoon is not applicable for large scale applications.


> With the new contribution for Expires response header and caching
> improvements, 2) shouldn't be a big deal any more.
> BTW, is Expires checked in already?

Definitely yes, in HEAD only. I still have to understand some quirks in 
(reverse) proxy implementations, but it already works like a charm with 
clients (browsers). I hope to have it working RSN ar 100% with cachine 
enabled reverse proxies, but it already gives a sensible performance 
boost as of now.

The other good news is that the whole Cocoon environment will have the 
Expires information, since it's in the objectModel. This might lead to a 
change in the cache algorithms (I'm waiting for Carsten to finish up his 
event/stream cache unification to have a look at it), taking into 
account even this information.

Diana: an HOWTO is on the way, I promise :-)

Ciao,

-- 
Gianugo Rabellino


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to