Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > > Maybe I should have pointed out that the change is backward > compatible? Did > you try doing "cvs co xml-cocoon2"? It still works... > > It's not that things can be "reverted", it's that things, for the eyes who > doesn't want to see the change, does not exist... The repository name, > LITERALLY is still there, with the old name and the whole > thing... The only > thing you see now are also few new "repositories" which are my proposal to > this list (it's an infrastructure "diff" with a lot of + and no - > lines) :-) > > Sorry if I wasn't clear from the beginning... > So, you created new repositores as part of your proposal? What will happen if I now check-in something only into the old rep? What will happen if I now check-in something only into the new rep?
I don't see that it helps to create a repository to discuss how it should be named. So can we then simply start a proposal on how to name the repositories? Thanks Carsten
