Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> First, my feeling is that if there is a better syntax, I would like >> to simply adopt it. I don't care what the definition of better is: >> technical, community, whatever. >> > So where is the right place to discuss the syntax? In short: Cocoon > has many dependencies but the description for the dependencies is a > little bit confusing (at least for me), and has some shortcommings. > There is for example no common naming scheme for dependencies, so you > can for example call fop either fop, or xml-fop or whatever you want.
I'd recommend the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. But I am willing to discuss it anywhere. At the moment, the following is effectively the equivalent of an alias:
<project name="jakarta-ant">
<depend project="ant" inherit="jars"/>
</project>We could make this simpler with a new <alias/> tag that has the same effect. Thoughts?
- Sam Ruby
