>> > Another thing is: why do you actually use >> > <currentident>@<AC-id>.users.undernet.org and not > <AC-id>@users.undernet.org >> > ? For opers it might become <AC-id>@opers.undernet.org. >> >> Either way is acceptable, it's just the way that it was coded when it was >> submitted.
> Undernet Channel Serivce = *@<username>.cservice.undernet.org > Undernet User Committee = *@<username>.user-com.undernet.org > Etc... > I think this will be cool too..it's just another idea about that. But then you have to have some kind of system to register user-com members apart from cservice members... and then you also have to consider the issue that some people work in both areas. User-com doesn't have any username registration systems... so that'd maybe have to be made just to fit this idea. I think the current idea of *@<username>.users.undernet.org is fine. -- Valcor
