Don`t think giving a user an @Guest*.users.undernet.org is so much complex. (without the removal after 60 seconds and all that) ... Users are given @Guest*.users.undernet.org and it will swap to @Username.users.undernet.org upon login and never showing their real ip.
Regards, Ivan Degiorgio AiRMaFiA @ IRC -----Original Message----- From: net [mailto:net@;astrolink.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:32 PM To: Larry Kaeto; Ivan Degiorgio Cc: Undernet Coder Committee Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion That sounds like an aweful complex way of original host hiding. Why not just do the traditional "Undernet.sub.domain.com" or "127.0.0.xxx" instead of all this fancy stuff? Cheers, net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Kaeto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ivan Degiorgio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Undernet Coder Committee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:04 AM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion > I think this is a good idea! > > HIGH^5 Ivan *smiles* > > They get Guest*.users.undernet.org on connect, this immediately hides the IP > of the user, then Services messages the user to login, you log in (manually > or via a nifty client script), then your host is changed to your > username.users.undernet.org. > > If the client does not reply within say 60 secs?, the guest* is dropped, and > your permitted to join/chat as you please as your real ip. The condition > here is that you can not join a channel/send msg's while you're a Guest* or > are dropped within 60 secs automatically of your guest* host if you just > fail to login or if you send a reply back say /msg services nomask ? then > you get dropped as Guest* and you can irc as you please. > > This also gives other Services further time to scan for proxies/trojans and > the like within this 60 second bracket? > > Probably not achievable in the short term, or probably not even feasible, > who knows, but *sounds* nice. > > Thanks, > > Larry > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ivan Degiorgio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Undernet Coder Committee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:30 PM > Subject: RE: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion > > > > Was the +x done so that noone`s real host is visible ? > > > > If yes is it possible to give a user > > > > @Guest00001.users.undernet.org > > @Guest00002.users.undernet.org etc etc > > > > on connect. and when logged in it will change to the normal > > username.users.undernet.org ? > > > > If no is it possible to add an option to X to +x you automatically on > > connect ? like /msg x set hidehost on or something > > > > Sharing my thoughts :) > > > > Regards, > > Ivan Degiorgio > > AiRMaFiA @ IRC > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:owner-coder-com@;undernet.org]On Behalf Of éL NìçoS > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:15 PM > > To: Chris Crowther > > Cc: Undernet Coder Committee > > Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion > > > > > > In stead off the client performing the mode +x, you could ma&ybe implement > > a syntax change in the login message... That way you could have an > optional > > term, and the server would perform mode +x for you on login. > > > > For exemple: > > /msg [EMAIL PROTECTED] login <username> <paswoord> [option] > > > > Maybe you could implement a /login cmd in the IRCu-code itself? If that is > > used the server would give you the mode +x, just like opers recieve mode > +O > > when using /oper? > > > > My 2 cents (euro's) > > > > regards > > > > > >
