In stead off the client performing the mode +x, you could ma&ybe implement
a syntax change in the login message... That way you could have an optional
term, and the server would perform mode +x for you on login.

For exemple:
/msg [EMAIL PROTECTED] login <username> <paswoord> [option]

Maybe you could implement a /login cmd in the IRCu-code itself? If that is
used the server would give you the mode +x, just like opers recieve mode +O
when using /oper?

My 2 cents (euro's)

regards


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 22 October 2002 10:32, Frederic Kinnaer wrote:

> Why don't base I:Line passwords on X passwords ?? Ex: Only that account
> could sign in to the server .. (For hidden servers), and if services
down,
> the current I:Line password.

I don't really see the point in that.

> Anyway, i'm in the oppinion that you always have to be able to log in to
X
> via PRIVMSG !

No one is talking about removing the ability to login via privmsg, just
supplementing it with the ability to login on connect, so that mode +x can
be
set on your client before it's even announced to the network.  That way
your
host is hidden from the start.

> Regards,
> Ace

- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9tTmSz8bl0gyT/hERAg7EAKDy+86MgEq8xraXi8l2jQYSo+yikwCg18bb
Fwv901zW8Vs6KOaWB8Eo+Zc=
=Tkfj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply via email to