[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16381013#comment-16381013
]
Joseph Percivall commented on MINIFI-441:
-----------------------------------------
Hey [~aldrin], do you by chance know which dockerfile was used and uploaded to
dockerhub for 0.4.0? I'm assuming it's just what's in Github under Dockerhub
with the version changed but since it's still on 0.2.0, I'm not 100%.
> Update Dockerfile to '0.4.0' and better align with practices set in NiFi
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MINIFI-441
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-441
> Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Joseph Percivall
> Priority: Major
>
> The DockerHub Dockerfile[1] still lists 0.2.0 (even though dockerhub is up to
> 0.4.0[2]). Also, it doesn't appear to follow best practices like the NiFi
> Dockerfile[3] does, such as tailing the log file for exposing to the docker
> log.
> Lastly, there doesn't appear to be any documentation on the expected way to
> pass the bootstrap.conf and config.yml files. I'm assuming that this is done
> by creating a volume at the expected config location but this should be
> documented since, unlike NiFi, the instance is essentially useless if a
> config.yml isn't passed.
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/blob/master/minifi-docker/dockerhub/Dockerfile
>
> [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/nifi-minifi/tags/
> [3]
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-docker/dockerhub/Dockerfile
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
