SEZ9 commented on PR #11307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11307#issuecomment-5650255252

   Thanks @goutamadwant for 0f2c42cbf — the EN/ZH guidance for existing Spark 
3.4 deployments is what I was after for PR11307-F8; I'll read through it once 
the new-head CI finishes.
   
   On logging (PR11307-F4): the dependency tree showing only log4j-slf4j-impl 
2.17.1 with SLF4J 1.7.36 and no log4j-slf4j2-impl is reassuring. Since the full 
distribution wasn't rebuilt, could you either confirm that log4j-slf4j2-impl is 
no longer in the starter logging include list, or share a listing of the 
logging directory from a build of the Spark 3.5 starter so we can see what 
actually lands on the classpath? Either one closes this for me.
   
   On follow-ups:
   
   - Windows launcher (PR11307-F1, PR11307-F5): I'd prefer the fix in this PR. 
F1 doesn't need a Windows box to confirm — with delayed expansion disabled 
before the variables are used, the branches compare literal strings and the 
call target is literal text, so the script can't run a job as written. 
Reordering so delayed expansion is active where needed, and propagating java's 
real exit code instead of exiting 0 (F5), is a small change; a full Windows 
execution test can be a follow-up if you don't have access to one.
   - Spark 3.5 micro-batch coverage (PR11307-F7): fine as a separate follow-up, 
provided we open a tracking issue for a dedicated 3.5 streaming test, and 
either do a one-off manual run of the streaming template on 3.5.8 and note the 
result here, or adjust the quick-start wording so we aren't pointing 3.5 users 
at an unexercised path.
   
   Still open from the earlier review: the shell launcher executing a command 
line assembled from job config values (PR11307-F2), the unquoted args and 
classpath variables in the same script (PR11307-F6), and a note about the 
runtime-only surfacing of any Catalyst incompatibility from reusing the 3.3 
translation layer in the 3.5 starter (PR11307-F3). Could you say whether you 
plan to address those here or how you'd like to handle them?
   
   I'll do a final pass once CI reports on the new head.
   
   <!-- streview-comment:1004 -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to