DanielLeens commented on PR #12299:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12299#issuecomment-5713026670

   Thanks for the rigorous follow-up, especially the control experiment on 
`engine-v2-it` — pushing your PR's exact base plus an unrelated three-line 
README comment and reproducing the identical 
`SplitClusterFaultToleranceIT.testStreamJobCancelResolvesWhenWorkerCrashesBeforeCancelAck`
 failure ([run 
35166337277](https://github.com/SEZ9/seatunnel/actions/runs/35166337277)) is 
exactly the kind of evidence that turns "probably unrelated" into "confirmed 
unrelated." I checked both issues you filed and they're real and open:
   
   - #12344 — `OpengaussCDCIT.testAddFieldWithRestore`, now the 
`all-connectors-it-2` failure here.
   - #12353 — the worker-crash-during-cancel `FAILED` vs `CANCELED` 
terminal-state bug behind `engine-v2-it`, reproduced independently on 
unmodified `dev`.
   
   I re-checked the PR's live status: head is still `9531cecd4` (same one my 
last review covered), `Build` is `FAILURE`, and `mergeStateStatus` is `BLOCKED` 
— consistent with exactly these two tracked, unrelated failures and nothing 
else. So there's no new diff for me to re-review here.
   
   My merge recommendation from the last round stands unchanged: no blockers on 
the code itself, Issue 1 (the `LogContentReader` truncation-notice deciding 
"was this truncated?" from a second, non-atomic `Files.size(path)` call after 
`readFileTailToStr` already took its own snapshot) remains open as a 
non-blocking Medium for whenever you'd like to close it.
   
   Once dev picks up fixes for #12344/#12353 (or this branch rebases past 
them), a green `Build` is the only remaining item before this is mergeable from 
my side. Appreciate you tracking these upstream instead of leaving them as 
unexplained red — makes this much easier to reason about.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to