manupa-arm commented on a change in pull request #7785:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/7785#discussion_r620080936



##########
File path: src/runtime/crt/memory/stack_allocator.c
##########
@@ -16,17 +16,22 @@
  * specific language governing permissions and limitations
  * under the License.
  */
-
 // LINT_C_FILE
-
 #include <tvm/runtime/crt/stack_allocator.h>
+#ifdef TVM_CRT_DEBUG
+#include <tvm/runtime/crt/logging.h>
+#endif
 
 void* StackMemoryManager_Allocate(tvm_workspace_t* tvm_runtime_workspace, 
int32_t nbytes) {
   uint32_t offset_bytes = (~nbytes + 1) & (TVM_RUNTIME_ALLOC_ALIGNMENT_BYTES - 
1);
   uint8_t* current_alloc = tvm_runtime_workspace->next_alloc;
   uint8_t* next_alloc = tvm_runtime_workspace->next_alloc + nbytes + 
offset_bytes;
   uint8_t* workspace_end = tvm_runtime_workspace->workspace + 
tvm_runtime_workspace->workspace_size;
-
+#ifdef TVM_CRT_DEBUG

Review comment:
       Cool! I agree that alignment should be considered in a higher-level 
memory planning work. :). 
   However, as shown here, its trivial to support a global alignment (that 
addressed produced by the allocator is aligned to a global granularity) might 
be beneficial in the mean time.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to