> -----Original Message----- > From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: woensdag 16 januari 2002 13:49 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [simplestore] inital check in > > > > >Jep, and I do the same in my app, but a layer lower (_not_ > in the cache, > >but in the DB layer, which is the persistency layer I > described above). > > It may interesting for you if you do the same in your app. > > I use cashe this way: > > //implementation of StorageCacheHelper not the last implementation, > synchronized in the last Layer. > // Synchronization Layer implements the same interface. > > Object call(String name, Object args [] ){ > > ResultWrapper wrp= null; // need wrapper for result if > result is null > > > //Cashe implementation wraps java.util.Map interfce, real cashe > implementation > // depends on Map implementation, and can be reused in any > kind of cache , > it can be HashMap,WeakMap, //SomeMRUMap. > > wrp = map.get(name, args ); > if(wrp != null) return wrp.result; > > Object result = > myRealStorageLayerImplementsTheSameInterfaceAs_this > (name, args ); > wrp = new ResultWrapper(result); > > if(procDescriptor(name).flushCache()) { > procDescriptor(name).flush(); > } > > if(procDescriptor(name).useCashe()){ > map.put( KeyPair(name,args), wrp ); > } > > return wrp.result; > > } > > } > > it is not fragment from real implementation, my real > implementation is more > complex and SQL dependant. > But I have plans to fix it.
Very interesting... believe it or not, but I just had started refactoring of my cache and store in the way you describe here. Maybe I finally start to understand you ;-) tomK -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
