> Well it isn't actually, but I've been told to shut up, so I'll leave it > here.
Unlike Ted, I think you should try to get your point trough. If you are sure that everybody else understood your POV and everybody is against, THEN it is the time to quit. If you think you were still not understood, then you should try to get trough. I would not have changed my mind if it was not for Costin arguments. That only happened because Costin did not stay quiet. Have fun, Paulo > -----Original Message----- > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:40 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release > > > On 2/4/02 6:43 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Inline... > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:28 AM > >> > >> We have the ability to affect change on this thing I believe > is a problem. > >> (One answer is "It's not a problem" I suppose...) > >> > >> The only answers I hear are "Things are fine" or "Tomorrow..." > or "That's > >> prevented by the rules". > > > > And IT IS prevented by the rules. A lot of people would veto the kind > > of nastiness you are afraid of and the mess would be rolled back. > > Well it isn't actually, but I've been told to shut up, so I'll leave it > here. > > > > >> I know it's hypothetical, and has been ruled to be a waste of > >> bandwidth, but > >> what about the "log4j crew" vs "logkit crew" in the the > "everyone gets to > >> vote irrespective of contribution" model? > > > > AFAIK only some of us are proposing such model to be applied to the > > whole Jakarta (and I am NOT one of them). > > > > Besides, a lot of people (including me) would prefer to have BOTH > > LogKit and Log4J and veto such mess. > > I want both too. > > > I also think that both logging teams, although not always very wise, > > are still much wiser than that. > > > > I know. I have high regard for Ceki and Peter. That's why its > hypothetical. > > geir > > -- > Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > System and Software Consulting > You're going to end up getting pissed at your software > anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
