Inline... > -----Original Message----- > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:28 AM > > We have the ability to affect change on this thing I believe is a problem. > (One answer is "It's not a problem" I suppose...) > > The only answers I hear are "Things are fine" or "Tomorrow..." or "That's > prevented by the rules".
And IT IS prevented by the rules. A lot of people would veto the kind of nastiness you are afraid of and the mess would be rolled back. > I know it's hypothetical, and has been ruled to be a waste of > bandwidth, but > what about the "log4j crew" vs "logkit crew" in the the "everyone gets to > vote irrespective of contribution" model? AFAIK only some of us are proposing such model to be applied to the whole Jakarta (and I am NOT one of them). Besides, a lot of people (including me) would prefer to have BOTH LogKit and Log4J and veto such mess. I also think that both logging teams, although not always very wise, are still much wiser than that. > geir Have fun, Paulo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
