> -----Original Message----- > From: Lavandowska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:29 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: Commons Util 1.0 release candidate 1 > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > IO is sounding like the place then. Lance, are you the main live > > author of the http stuff? I see your name on RequestUtils and know > > you've at least > > delved into BrowserDetector. Are you in favour of IO? > > Fine by me. I'd rather hoped that the existence of > RequestUtils would inspire additions to it, which hasn't > happened (perhaps it isn't necessary?). To answer the
I've been lurking around the package discussion and I'd like to put in a good word for a separate servlet package. When I started poking around commons, I too was a bit surprised that there were not more servlet-related additions. In the past couple of days I been cleaning up some of my servlet helper methods, and was trying to figure out a good place to propose them. I was trying to get up the nerve to propose a servlet package when this whole discussion fired off. I don't think servlet-related helpers belong in IO. To use Bayard's criteria, mine don't throw IOException or take OutputStream. > earlier question, the "header" stuff could be done simply > with a case-insensitive comparision due to different > containers using either "-" or "_" to seperate header names. > Steven Caswell _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
