On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Michael A. Smith wrote: > I'm not going to argue this anymore though. I've changed my position -- > why is this class even included in commons when the JDK provides a > reverse/inverse comparator already? @see Collections.reverseOrder()
I just answered my own question. Collections.reverseOrder() inverts/reverses the natural ordering, but does not invert/reverse the ordering of an arbitrary comparator like the collections version does. That's a good reason to keep the commons version around. michael -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
