Is this +1 on the move of the jelly tags for betwixt to betwxit itself ? (the thing I was investigating..)
Mvgr, Martin On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 06:52, James Strachan wrote: > +1 > > From: "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think the Betwixt tags might be better as a separate > > build, although that build could be under the Jelly or > > Betwixt tree. > > > > Here's the rule of thumb IMO. If an application > > cannot be executed without Jelly (e.g. Maven, Latka), > > then the application should host the tags in its main > > build. Contrarily if the Jelly tags is simply an > > alternative syntax for a library (e.g. Betwixt, > > HttpClient), then those tags should have a separate > > build rather than pulling all the Jelly dependencies > > into the main build. All IMO. > > Good rule. > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
