On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 07:42 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
hi daniel
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, robert burr
ell donkin writes:
I vote +1, but I would add that Steve Cohen should probably be made athe proposal's is in the net documentation:http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/net/proposal.html.
committer given that he's made a substantial code contribution that will
likely be incorporated into a post 1.0 release. The only reason he's not
listed as an initial committer in the proposal is because he's not already an
Apache committer and the sandbox is for existing Apache committers to
play in. I'm also sure one or two Ant committers are willing to play
a small role to represent Ant's requirements. Brett Smith also just
made a contribution that would be sufficient to qualify him for committer
nomination in many projects, and I believe Winston Ojeda previously made
a similar contribution. We can update the proposal to reflect this if
required, but at the very least I think we should consider Steve Cohen as
an initial committer for the project because he clearly intends to remain
active. I've added Steve to the proposal as an initial committer; we can
take care of the nomination formalities later since a new promotion vote
has been initiated.
sorry i pushed this vote a bit too early.
i'm a little unclear about the meaning of your last sentence. the proposal being voted on was the one at the start of the vote (which is why rodney was right that i should have been included it in the initial email). do you mean that you're happy for the current vote to continue on the original proposal and then formally nominate steve once the vote's finished?
- robert
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
