I don't think we should submit these patches. Instead I would like to nominate Tim O'Brien as a Jakarta Commons commiter.
He has been supplying patches to the Codec project for the last 4 months [at least], has refactored much of the existing Codec code and is the one involved with Codec with the best vision for Codec's future. There has been increasing interest in the Codec project over the last few months, and it needs someone to be focusing on it. Tim has been contributing to the Apache community's mail lists for a while now and I believe is ready. [best i can get the mailing list to spew out is: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=103738082600002&r=1&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=103763510400004&r=1&w=2 ] Hen On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote: > Here is a patch to fix CRLF problems in Soundex.java. > > I'm going to submit a few patches in the next couple of days, I'll hit the > "low hanging fruit" first, and move on to patches after that. > > If you are interested, > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?action=edit&id=CodecProjectPage > s shows a little list of thoughts for Codec. If you've got input, (and I > know that people have had input in the past), let's start s discussion > either on this list or on that page. > > I'm going to submit a few patches in the next couple of days, I'll hit the > low hanging fruit first, and move on to patches after that. Right now, I've > got a patch from Iulian that needs some looking at, and some old submissions > from Kyle Burton. > > -------- > Tim O'Brien > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 6:34 AM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: RE: Wiki and [codec] > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > > > > I see one: > > > > > > Jan 20 Iulian Musat (11,350) [Sandbox] [Codec] [PATCH] Base64 > > > > Ok, I'll try to take a look. > > > > > Plus a patch that Tim himself was reworking because it was cvs > > > clashing with a change of yours Rodney. > > > > I'm not sure what this one is. I haven't touched anything in > > codec since Nov 18 of last year. > > > > > Hen > > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote: > > > > > > > > > On a related note, [codec] is languishing. We've had two code > > > > > submissions that haven't been taken up in recent > > months. I think > > > > > it might be time for a repolishing of the proposal. My > > DayJob is > > > > > 24/7 these days, but I'll take a crack at a project plan in the > > > > > coming week if no one else steps up to the plate. > > > > > > > > Tim, if you can point me to the patches that fell through the > > > > cracks, and even better, endorse them as reasonable and > > tested, I'd > > > > be more than happy to take a look. > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
