+1..

Mvgr,
Martin

On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 22:29, Henri Yandell wrote:
> 
> I don't think we should submit these patches. Instead I would like to
> nominate Tim O'Brien as a Jakarta Commons commiter.
> 
> He has been supplying patches to the Codec project for the last 4 months
> [at least], has refactored much of the existing Codec code and is the
> one involved with Codec with the best vision for Codec's future.
> 
> There has been increasing interest in the Codec project over the last few
> months, and it needs someone to be focusing on it. Tim has been
> contributing to the Apache community's mail lists for a while now and I
> believe is ready.
> 
> [best i can get the mailing list to spew out is:
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=103738082600002&r=1&w=2
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=103763510400004&r=1&w=2
> ]
> 
> Hen
> 
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote:
> 
> > Here is a patch to fix CRLF problems in Soundex.java.
> >
> > I'm going to submit a few patches in the next couple of days, I'll hit the
> > "low hanging fruit" first, and move on to patches after that.
> >
> > If you are interested,
> > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?action=edit&id=CodecProjectPage
> > s shows a little list of thoughts for Codec.  If you've got input, (and I
> > know that people have had input in the past), let's start s discussion
> > either on this list or on that page.
> >
> > I'm going to submit a few patches in the next couple of days, I'll hit the
> > low hanging fruit first, and move on to patches after that.  Right now, I've
> > got a patch from Iulian that needs some looking at, and some old submissions
> > from Kyle Burton.
> >
> > --------
> > Tim O'Brien
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 6:34 AM
> > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: RE: Wiki and [codec]
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I see one:
> > > >
> > > > Jan 20 Iulian Musat       (11,350) [Sandbox] [Codec] [PATCH] Base64
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll try to take a look.
> > >
> > > > Plus a patch that Tim himself was reworking because it was cvs
> > > > clashing with a change of yours Rodney.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what this one is.  I haven't touched anything in
> > > codec since Nov 18 of last year.
> > >
> > > > Hen
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On a related note, [codec] is languishing.  We've had two code
> > > > > > submissions that haven't been taken up in recent
> > > months.  I think
> > > > > > it might be time for a repolishing of the proposal.  My
> > > DayJob is
> > > > > > 24/7 these days, but I'll take a crack at a project plan in the
> > > > > > coming week if no one else steps up to the plate.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tim, if you can point me to the patches that fell through the
> > > > > cracks, and even better, endorse them as reasonable and
> > > tested, I'd
> > > > > be more than happy to take a look.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to