Well said. Totally agree.
Ryan Hoegg wrote:
We do as well. Codec should probably end up with the union, not the
intersection However, ours tests for the MIME specific 76 character
line wrapping.
--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net
Jeffrey Dever wrote:
That sounds good here too. We only call Base64 methods a couple of
times anyway, so adaptation is a minor issue.
Just a note about tests, we have a Junit test class (not sure if
xml-rpc has one) that should go along with the main Base64 class.
You did a grep on the code base so I'm sure you are aware of it.
Jandalf.
I like your plan Tim. Let's get 1.1 nailed down so we are all on
the same codebase, and do the design of 2.0 right. I don't think
XML-RPC cares much whether we get the default in decode(byte[]) in
1.1, I think that decision should be made based on RFC interpretation.
--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
