--- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > re: > http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/stories/2003/04/01/JavasCheckedExceptionsWe > reAMistake.html > > Although I don't entirely agree with the analysis, I do agree that the > proposed technique can be useful. Is this exception going to be added > somewhere to Jakarta-Commons for general use? Where will it be packaged > for > re-use?
The reasoning for such an approach seems to be, "Pool throws unchecked exceptions and DBCP doesn't so we need a wrapper." In that case, pool is in error, not DBCP. It would be sad to see the Commons start using RuntimeExceptions everywhere as it's a really poor design technique. David > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
