> > Would you please refresh my memory a link the message explaining the > > source of Geronimo source? I think that most people believe, including > > me, that it is refactored jBoss code, how else could so much code > > apear.
> Come on, Vic. Take this to the geronimo list if you have accusations. The one time he posted to the geronimo-dev list (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache.org&msgId=790688), he chose not to deal with the responses to his accusations. > They are free to re-license their code if they choose to Correct. As long as it is *their* code, and not work-for-hire, a derived work with someone else's IP, or some other situation where they don't have complete rights to the work. In any event, he was convinced of the origin of the code before there was any, so why should his a priori view be any different now? > Take it to the members list or the Geronimo list. He can't take it to the members list. He's not a Member. Which also means that he's not privy to whatever, if any, discussion occured on that list regarding Geronimo or any other project, as the content of that list is confidential. Judging from his messages on Incubator General (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=&[EMAIL PROTECTED] bator.apache.org&searchText=Cekvenich&defaultField=sender&Search=Search), I can see why he is upset that Geronimo project got green lighted, and his basicPortal messages were ignored. basicPortal looks interesting. One problem is that far too many messages have been, and continue to be, ignored on Incubator. Incubator needs more resources. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
