Emmanuel Bourg wrote on Monday, June 21, 2004 8:17 PM: > Is there a good reason to keep the configurations using DOM4J instead > of their DOM based equivalent ? If there is no difference > between the two > I'm tempted to remove DOM4JConfiguration and > HierarchicalDOM4JConfiguration (or to move them to a contrib > directory), and then merge DOMConfiguration into XMLConfiguration and > HierarchicalDOMJConfiguration into HierarchicalConfiguration. > > What do you think ?
Taking Paul's comment into account, there seems not to be a real sufficient solution. DOCConfiguration is quite nice for JDK >= 1.4, since no additional dependency is generated. Therefore I vote in first place for the DOMConfiguration, but it might be good to have DOM4JConfiguration in e.g. commons-configuration-optional around and the possibility to tell the "core" to use this implementation. Comments? -- Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
