Emmanuel Bourg wrote on Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:06 PM: > Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Taking Paul's comment into account, there seems not to be a real >> sufficient solution. DOCConfiguration is quite nice for JDK >= 1.4, >> since no additional dependency is generated. Therefore I vote in >> first place for the DOMConfiguration, but it might be good to have >> DOM4JConfiguration in e.g. commons-configuration-optional around and >> the possibility to tell the "core" to use this implementation. >> >> Comments? > > DOMConfiguration is even nice for JDK 1.3 since most server > environnements under this version provide the standard XML > APIs. I don't > think [configuration] is performance critical enough to > justify the use > of an additional dependency, and there are other possible > optimizations if a better implementation is really needed (for > example the properties could be stored only once in the > BaseConfiguration and the DOM parser could be dropped for a SAX > parser). > > I tend to prefer a complete removal of the DOM4J classes to > cut down the > maintenance burden.
Fine with me. -- Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
